|
Adaptive Behavior, 3 (1) |
||||||||||||
|
Adaptive BehaviorVolume 3, Number 1Summer 1994Table of ContentsLashon B. BookerEditorialStefano Nolfi, Jeffrey L. Elman, and Domenico ParisiLearning and Evolution in Neural NetworksAdaptive Behavior, 3 (1), 5-28.Charles X. Ling and Ralph BuchalLearning to Control Dynamic Systems with Automatic QuantizationAdaptive Behavior, 3 (1), 29-49.Bridget E. Hallam, Janet R. P. Halperin, John C. T. HallamAn Ethological Model for Implementation in Mobile RobotsAdaptive Behavior, 3 (1), 51-79.Peter M. ToddIntroduction to New Section: Reviews and announcements of books of interestGeoffrey F. Miller and Peter M. ToddA Bottom-up Approach with a Clear View of the Top: How Human Evolutionary Psychology Can Inform Adaptive Behavior ResearchReview of The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, edited by Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides & John Tooby. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Recent Books of InterestPages 1-3 EditorialBy Lashon B. BookerLearning and Evolution in Neural NetworksBy Stefano Nolfi, Jeffrey L. Elman, Domenico ParisiAbstractThis article describes simulations on populations of neural networks that both evolve at the population level and learn at the individual level. Unlike other simulations, the evolutionary task (finding food in the environment) and the learning task (predicting the next position of food on the basis of present position and planned network's movement) are different tasks. In these conditions, learning influences evolution (without Lamarckian inheritance of learned weight changes) and evolution influences learning. Average but not peak fitness has a better evolutionary growth with learning than without learning. After the initial generations, individuals that learn to predict during life also improve their food-finding ability during life. Furthermore, individuals that inherit an innate capacity to find food also inherit an innate predisposition to learn to predict the sensory consequences of their movements. They do not predict better at birth, but they do learn to predict better than individuals of the initial generation given the same learning experience. The results are interpreted in terms of a notion of dynamic correlation between the fitness surface and the learning surface. Evolution succeeds in finding both individuals that have high fitness and individuals that, although they do not have high fitness at birth, end up with high fitness because they learn to predict.Key Wordslearning; evolution; neural networks; artificial life
Learning to Control Dynamic Systems with Automatic QuantizationBy Charles X. Ling and Ralph BuchalAbstractLearning to control dynamic systems with unknown models is a challenging research problem. However, most previous work that learns qualitative control rules does not construct qualitative states; a proper partition of continuous-state variables has to be designed by human users and given to the learning programs. We design a new learning method that learns appropriate qualitative state representation and the control rules simultaneously. Our method can aggressively partition the continuous-state variables into finer, discrete ranges until control rules based on these ranges are learned. As a case study, we apply our method to the benchmark control problem of cart-pole balancing (also known as the inverted pendulum). Experimental results show that our method not only derives different partitions for the cart-pole systems with different parameters but also learns to control the systems for an extended period of time from random initial positions.Key Wordsadaptive control; reinforcement learning; automatic quantization
An Ethological Model for Implementation in Mobile RobotsBy Bridget E. Hallam, Janet R. P. Halperin, John C. T. HallamAbstractThis article describes a neuroethological model of learning and motivation that accounts for many of the behavioral phenomena observed in animals. Unusual predictions from the model have been tested and shown to be demonstrable in laboratory Siamese fighting fish. In addition, the model is sufficiently mathematically well defined to be implementable in a robot or in computer simulation. A trial implementation in a mobile robot was carried out as part of this work. This article describes a simplified version of the model that was programmed into the robot, a thought experiment designed to show the main features of the model, and the preliminary robot experiments that were carried out. Using robots for ethological models of animal behavior is interesting for both robotics and ethological research: The study of robot autonomy can be enhanced through an understanding of complex and realistic models of animal autonomy, and ethological research should benefit from a supply of guaranteed "naive" agents on which rigorous testing of such models is tractable.Key Wordslearning; mobile robot; behavioral model
Page 81 Introduction to New Section: Reviews and announcements of books of interestBy Peter M. ToddPages 83-95 A Bottom-up Approach with a Clear View of the Top: How Human Evolutionary Psychology Can Inform Adaptive Behavior ResearchBy Geoffrey F. Miller and Peter M. ToddReview of The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, edited by Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides & John Tooby. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Pages 97-100 Recent Books of Interestback to TOC, back to top |
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
06:45 UTC; 19/08/08 |
Comments or Questions? Contact Us.. Copyright © 2008, ISAB. All rights reserved. |
||||||||||||